If you want automobiles, you want MotorWeek. Period. John Davis is a saint, and anybody who says in any other case is routinely excommunicated from the Cool People Car Club. Enjoy a lifetime of horrible opinions and no associates, hater. You not have a spot amongst us, the right automotive fans.
That stated, similar to each different outlet, MotorWeek isn’t good. Sometimes errors are made, and there’s nothing incorrect with speaking about them in a respectful, level-headed approach. In reality, it’s wholesome for automotive fans to criticize one thing that’s clearly not proper. This time round, it’s fairly critical, too.
Yesterday, MotorWeek uploaded its video evaluate of the 2005 Lamborghini Gallardo. Except somebody mistakenly listed it as a “Retro Review.” Which is insane on its face, I do know. Is John Davis trolling me? Is this a private factor? What did I ever do to offend you, John? If you need to discuss, I’m positive we are able to work this out.
There’s merely no approach 2005 is much sufficient prior to now for it to depend as retro. I’m not going to trouble counting what number of years in the past it was, however absolutely, it’s solely a pair. Yeah, I used to be nonetheless in highschool again in 2005, however I’m nonetheless younger. I might nonetheless be cool if I wished to be. There’s no approach I’m sufficiently old for a automotive I used to be obsessive about in highschool to be a retro evaluate. There simply isn’t.
The video itself additionally incorporates some bizarre inconsistencies. I bear in mind the Gallardo being a supercar, however when MotorWeek examined its zero-to-60 mph time, it took 5.1 seconds. That’s considerably slower than a Kia EV6. In what world is a Lamborghini slower than a Kia? Something is clearly incorrect right here, and I can solely hope MotorWeek figures out who’s behind all of this and fires them.
Source: jalopnik.com