It’s virtually a cliche today to level out to a Boomer that “they don’t build them like they used to,” is definitely a great factor as a result of vehicles today are a lot safer than they had been within the Sixties and Nineteen Seventies. That doesn’t imply that each one vehicles are equally secure, although. Some are positively worse than others. Take, for instance, two vehicles not offered within the U.S., the MG 5 and Mahindra Scorpio. As Motor1 not too long ago reported, each obtained zero stars of their Australasian New Car Assessment Program.
From a design standpoint, the MG 5 seems to be first rate sufficient, and a few would possibly scoff at it being dinged for not having a driver monitoring system or baby detection system, but it surely additionally lacks seatbelt pre-tensioners and a middle airbag to maintain occupants from smashing into one another within the occasion of a crash.
Based on the ANCAP crash outcomes, you additionally actually don’t need to be in an MG 5 when it crashes, with the report declaring, “The driver’s chest deflection exceeded limits and was rated POOR. Structures in the dashboard were a potential source of injury for the driver and a penalty was applied, with protection of the upper legs was rated MARGINAL. Protection of the driver’s lower legs was POOR.”
The Mahindra Scorpio additionally not too long ago scored zero stars in its ANCAP crash take a look at. That’s partly as a result of the third row lacks facet head-protecting airbags. And whereas the ANCAP take a look at solely evaluated the six-seat model, there’s a seven-seat model obtainable in New Zealand that solely has a lap belt for the middle second-row passenger.
Testing additionally discovered that the “front structure of the Mahindra Scorpio presented a high risk to occupants of an oncoming vehicle in the MPDB test (which evaluates vehicle-to-vehicle compatibility), and the maximum 8.00 point penalty was applied. In the full width frontal test, protection of the driver dummy was WEAK for the chest and GOOD for all other critical body areas. Protection of the rear passenger head, neck and chest was POOR based on dummy readings and high seatbelt loads.”
As a lot as we love the concept of getting our fingers on forbidden fruit, we’re simply going to say it’s in all probability nice that neither of those vehicles are offered within the U.S. We all need issues we will’t have, however typically there’s a great cause we will’t have them.
Source: jalopnik.com