Little yellow dots emblazoned on the again of helmets have grow to be an increasing number of prevalent previously few years. That dot, after all, means the helmet is provided with a slip layer often known as the Multi-directional Impact Protection System, or MIPS, because the model is understood. MIPS has greater than doubled the variety of manufacturers it labored with simply three years earlier, now partnering with 143 manufacturers that span industries from motorsports and biking, to snow sports activities and even building. In motorsports, MIPS works with the next manufacturers:
Everything You Wanted To Know About MIPS
509
Alpinestars
Answer
Arctiva
AVA
Bell
BMW
Fox
Icon
Just1
Kabuto
Klim
KTM
KYT
LS2
Moose Racing
MSR
O’Neal
Scott
Thor
Z1R
During my time at MO, I’ve had the chance to make use of helmets with 5 totally different approaches to managing rotational power. MIPS nonetheless, appears to be rising in reputation at an exponential price compared to these different approaches. In hopes of studying why that was and what else the Swedish firm has been as much as previously few years, I had the chance to take a seat down with Max Strandwitz, CEO of MIPS AB, for a fast interview after a MIPS Safety Symposium right here in Southern California.
MO: So, what’s new with MIPS?
Max Strandwitz: There had been a few issues that we talked about on the Safety Symposium at present. Due to COVID, we haven’t been capable of do a security symposium in about three years. So, after all, a variety of issues have occurred throughout that point. We have developed a variety of new expertise that we’re now bringing to the market. We haven’t been sitting idle. Today, we’ve got about twelve totally different applied sciences that we’re utilizing in our shopper’s helmets, all of them addressing the identical factor. Not that we differentiate by way of efficiency, however the implementation is totally different.
Today, we mentioned the totally different value factors that MIPS can match for our purchasers. Starting with what we name important. There, you get the fundamentals. So, with this, usually you see an extra value enhance round twenty US {dollars}. Then after all, you’ve gotten the extra built-in options the place you go up a bit bit in value level, the higher job it is going to do and, in some merchandise, really grow to be much less seen within the helmet. We have a brand new padding answer referred to as Integra TX the place you’ve gotten really the sibling expertise built-in straight into the padding. Fox simply launched two new helmets incorporating the Integra Split answer the place you’ve gotten twin densities. With Integra Split you’ve gotten a softer density nearer to the top after which a tougher density additional away from the top. You then redirect movement by a cut up building that strikes independently from each other. I feel that was an enormous shock for individuals once they noticed what number of totally different applied sciences we even have. That’s why and the way we will really create distinctive security tales with so many alternative manufacturers – piggy-backing loads on a model’s security story, how they need to combine MIPS, and ultimately, creating a fantastic story collectively.
Today, we additionally talked about how profitable we’ve got been in motocross. There are 36 supercross and pro-am riders now with MIPS expertise. I feel we had 173 mixed podium finishes throughout every self-discipline through the 2022 season and a successful share of 72% for riders outfitted with the MIPS system. In motocross, it actually begins working. People are getting it.
Then in case you have a look at the opposite aspect of it, the on-road aspect, we don’t see the identical traction. There has been a a lot slower acceptance of MIPS. We have executed a variety of market analysis. For occasion, in Europe, a mean rider is 47 years previous. They’ve been driving for twenty years and have by no means had an accident as a result of they’re so good at driving their bike. Even if the particular person could be uncovered to hazard, they are going to most likely handle as a result of they’re so assured the way to handle the motorbike. That’s the particular person we have to persuade. Many occasions, they may not need to put on a helmet in any respect.
Now after all, we’re helped by some regulatory adjustments. So in Europe, there’s a new testing commonplace which is named ECE 2206, the place they purpose to enhance the linear efficiency, not what MIPS does, however the regular efficiency of the helmet, and can work to filter out the worst performing ones. In time, it appears all requirements might be folding in rotational movement into the usual check certification, which is, after all, serving to us. This commonplace was applied about one and a half, two years in the past, and now from the primary of January in Europe, you’re really not allowed to provide helmets that don’t go the brand new commonplace. So, that, after all, helps loads. And then one other eighteen months from now, you will notice that helmets aren’t even allowed to be bought in a retailer that don’t go the brand new commonplace. Normally, they put the thresholds fairly low, after which over time, they enhance it, possibly each two years. So, for now, you’ll be able to nonetheless go the usual with none rotational movement safety. I feel that’s good as a result of it permits the trade to alter step by step.
Of course for us, we see a variety of traction in that space, but in addition for us, after we go right into a class or a sort of helmet, we would like to have the ability to reply all of the questions due to course we’re scientists. So at present, we additionally introduced a thesis the place we have a look at excessive velocity motorbike accidents. Because a variety of the assessments that individuals are doing within the laboratory, together with a variety of the requirements, use extra of the rolling movement. You really hit an angle then you definitely bounce off the stem, and then you definitely measure the sort of power that the helmet is challenged towards. But after all if you’re a MotoGP rider, Valentino Rossi, you journey with a mean of 150 miles per hour, you need to see that the expertise makes a distinction additionally in these accidents. So, we defined a bit bit on what we’ve got executed by way of validating the expertise additionally for these.
There was a scientific paper revealed a couple of yr in the past on this topic – we will after all ship that ahead – the place you see how we validate it in that space. Science is admittedly, actually necessary for us. We additionally walked by an accident reconstruction of a motocross accident the place there was a man that was main the race who was then hit by the rider in final place after a whiskey throttle accident. He then looped out the bike and hit the opposite rider within the head with the fender of the motorbike. Unfortunately, the rider ended up in a coma. Luckily, we had two cameras on the set so we may actually see the totally different impacts from the angles and had been capable of reconstruct the entire accident, which was after all nice. Not nice that it occurred after all, as a result of one of the best accidents are those that don’t occur, but when it occurs and we will study from this, we will make it possible for we progress, and the entire trade progresses.
MO: Why is MIPS extra outstanding in dust helmets than road?
MS: I feel that the notion of security may be very totally different in motocross. If you discuss to a motocross rider, it’s not a matter of if he’s going to crash, it’s only a matter of when. He’s fairly eager on sporting safety. He nearly appears to be like like Robocop when he’s going out racing; elbow pads, knee pads, shoulder pads, and an excellent helmet. You see that on a regular basis.
When it involves the entire trade and particularly to road, I nonetheless imagine that motorbike producers don’t need to educate riders as to how necessary security is. If you know the way harmful it’s to journey in a bike at 200 mph, some important others most likely received’t let you exit and do it. This is, after all, an necessary factor. If you go to, as an illustration, the world’s largest motorbike honest, which is EICMA, and also you undergo all of the motorcycle producers and so forth, you don’t see them speaking loads about security. It’s women sitting in bikinis or brief clothes, numerous flames, all the things must be black and so forth. I feel the trade has a job to do. Again, what I talked about earlier than, the entire new commonplace that’s coming into play is no less than having an impact. So, it begins to alter, and also you begin to see a variety of optimistic indicators within the trade. And we additionally begin to see in rising markets, as an illustration, that initially, they’re beginning to mandate helmets. But they’re additionally beginning to mandate higher helmets. In China, they applied a brand new helmet regulation a few years in the past. They didn’t say which helmet although, solely ‘wear a helmet’. Then suddenly we’re seeing individuals on their e-scooters driving with a hockey helmet on their head, or an equestrian helmet. They’ve now regulated that. I feel the entire world is turning into a safer place. Even although it’s most likely not the best phrase with struggle and all the things that we see round us at present, however no less than by way of motorbike.
MO: Considering the development of more and more angular designs in motocross helmets, Fox and Alpinestars as two examples, does this make mitigating rotational power harder? Obviously, the MIPS system is there to help on this regard, however would a smoother helmet design assist?
MS: What we usually be careful for is when a helmet has a variety of issues on the outer floor. We have the identical subject with street bike helmets. In bicycle, as an illustration, when you’ve gotten edgy, extremely ventilated helmets, we generally say to them, we’re not going to do it as a result of this isn’t elevating the security. You are letting design features take the higher of the helmet, and that’s not the best factor to do. Also, if a helmet has too many issues on the outer floor or is simply too edgy, you run the danger of catching on issues like branches off-road, and that may be extraordinarily harmful. Most manufacturers are very receptive to this dialogue, although. Of course, we at all times consider them; we at all times check them. Sometimes, we’ve got to say no as a result of it’s really making the helmet worse, and security ought to at all times be the highest precedence. I might say that Fox is the proper ambassador for us. We have a fantastic collaboration. Really good discussions. And we’ve got discussions about what we will and can’t do. They have a bit bit extra boxy design on their helmet, however it doesn’t imply that it’s counter productive in relation to security.
MO: Does MIPS work if the helmet isn’t 100% safe? There have been studies and findings from of us just like the Snell Memorial Foundation that counsel appreciable variations in efficiency between otherwise ready testing head varieties. These counsel a head type with silicon utilized to the highest advantages extra significantly from expertise like MIPS versus a head type with hair utilized to it which noticed little to no profit in these assessments.
MS: I imply, it’s at all times greatest to have a helmet that matches your head. So, if I may select, after all, that is most popular. Also, lots of people say that the chin strap is necessary. It’s necessary to have precisely the best match of the helmet. When the accident occurs, so long as the helmet sits accurately on the top when it occurs. Because you’ll be able to really, in case you’re fortunate, hit with an angle, you push the helmet on the top, and also you get a possibility for the expertise to work correctly. It doesn’t imply that it’s going to carry out worse, so long as you’ve gotten the helmet on. The level strain when you’ve gotten an accident is someplace round 750 to 1000 kilo. So, that strain doesn’t power the helmet to be good on the top, so long as you’re hitting the best place. So even when it does change it a bit bit, it nonetheless doesn’t matter as a result of the expertise nonetheless does the identical job. Given that we by no means know what sort of accident a rider goes to have, we’ve got expertise that works omnidirectionally. So, it ought to work in all instructions in any respect the totally different impacts. And that’s actually necessary for us as a result of we can not have a expertise that in case you fall, you must be certain that to fall on this route. You by no means know.
MO: It appears uncommon to see MIPS in lots of model’s flagship helmets. Do you discover manufacturers are serious about MIPS for decrease or mid-tier helmets to extend their worth proposition with clients?
MS: I feel there’s a mixture of various solutions. I imply, the head helmet is normally the MotoGP helmets and so forth. There it has really been fairly tough to get the correct dialogue with the model. Normally, they don’t promote a variety of items with these merchandise, and so they need to limit a variety of the helmet growth as a result of the helmet would possibly must be recertified, which is an costly and time-consuming course of. We have now developed an FIM homologated helmet with Kabuto to be used in MotoGP. This would be the first helmet with MIPS for use on the pinnacle of bike racing. That after all is a really robust begin. There might be extra which can be asking for a similar, and we plan to launch others later within the yr. So, you will notice extra MotoGP helmets outfitted with MIPS. When they bring about in a brand new MotoGP helmet, it could possibly simply keep in the marketplace for six to eight years, which signifies that the cycle shouldn’t be coming that usually. When a model introduces a brand new helmet, usually, they’re extra receptive to expertise. This is altering although. You will see extra MotoGP helmets being launched. Also, the riders are beginning to put demand on the manufacturers saying that, ‘Hey, this is my job. Why do you not focus on my safety? What am I to you?’ And I feel that’s the correct of problem.
MO: Speaking of the Kabuto F-17 Racing with MIPS and the FIM homologation, why is it that Kabuto, and maybe Arai, are the one helmet producers out of greater than 20 manufacturers to go FIM testing which can be having a dialog about managing rotational power particularly?
MS: The humorous factor is that we’re solely at first of the homologation course of. Right now, the thresholds for testing are actually low. If you have a look at the linear efficiency of the helmet, that’s already stressing a variety of the manufacturers as a result of in these assessments they’re pushing fairly laborious. In phrases of rotation, the thresholds are extraordinarily low. You can go it with none expertise. In the following testing commonplace improve, which might be fairly quickly, it is going to be more durable, after which, one other one will observe. It doesn’t imply that it needs to be MIPS, however you’ll most likely have to have some sort of expertise. Also after we discuss to those Japanese producers, you ask them, why are you not addressing this? ‘Ah, we don’t want it as a result of we’ve got Japanese engineers. They are one of the best on the planet, and so they know all the things we have to do.’ Okay, so you’re mind consultants? ‘Yes, if we need to be, we are.’ Okay. Shoei has its personal EPS pack that they’ve launched. We requested them, ‘Can’t you come to the workplace? We check collectively, we study collectively. You can share what you’ve gotten executed and so forth.’ And up to now they haven’t come.
Also, when you’ve gotten individuals who say {that a} laborious floor is sufficient, however you don’t know what’s going to occur in an accident. If you hit ice with a tough floor, yeah, it’s most likely going to work fairly properly, however you don’t know what sort of floor you’re going to hit. Also, if you make the outer shell too laborious, you have to soften different issues contained in the helmet. Which signifies that the density doesn’t at all times must be laborious, or must be softer, which is simpler to get caught on. So, you’ll be able to really be counterproductive. When I’ve talked about that with Arai, I’ve by no means gotten any solutions on how they’ve really validated what they are saying. I do know you’ve gotten most likely 2,000 years of expertise and efficiency. But we discuss science, we discuss information. Let’s study from one another.
MO: What are the downsides and counterarguments to MIPS? Or fairly, how do you counter the counter arguments?
MS: We really don’t. We have executed about 60,000 extra assessments than anybody. We have the most important check lab. We have probably the most engineers. If we hastily begin displaying what we’ve got executed at dwelling, after all, we’d solely need to present good assessments in good eventualities as a result of who would produce a check to indicate the general public we’re not performing properly? I feel that may mislead shoppers as a result of then in the long run they are going to belief nobody. That’s why we by no means publish our personal testing. We at all times depend on third social gathering testing, unbiased testing that insurance coverage corporations have executed as a result of we imagine that unbiased testing is one of the best. This means, you can not solely put your greatest helmet or your greatest check out, like we’d by no means do. Some others publish their very own testing. I query that loads. I feel it’s fallacious for the trade as a result of you’ll be able to by no means say, ‘in this perfect condition, in this specific test we actually performed well.’ Let another person do it. Take Virginia Tech’s Helmet Lab, as an illustration. They have executed a variety of assessments on bicycle helmets. I feel at present out of the highest 50, 45 of them use MIPS. I feel that’s a fantastic validation of the expertise. When it involves different applied sciences, we check all the things that comes out in the marketplace. If I see one thing that will be superior to MIPS, then after all I’ll most likely attempt to purchase it. At the second, we’re not shopping for every other expertise. I feel it might be nice to have totally different applied sciences, however I want to have the ability to use it. Currently, nearly, if not all expertise that we see on the market, wouldn’t go the MIPS approval check, so why would I purchase it? Of course, I don’t need to dangerous mouth different applied sciences as a result of I feel anybody that’s pushing the trade ahead must be rewarded for that. The market is sufficiently big for extra gamers. I like competitors. Competition will at all times make us higher and make it possible for we continually develop. Whatever doesn’t develop, will die at one level.
So, it’s not that. Then in relation to understanding rotational movement, I feel that’s the place most manufacturers fall brief. For occasion, Fly, they was a MIPS buyer, however the best way they talked about evaluating manufacturers to one another and placing these claims on their web site, that’s not how we do it at MIPS. We attempt to be very very like Popeye, the cartoon character. We are the most important and the strongest one, however we additionally must be good to the trade and really inclusive, which permits everybody to succeed. Speaking poorly about one other product to reinforce your individual is, I feel, a bit infantile, and that’s not what we’re going to do. For us, it’s actually unhappy that the trade has to go there. There are different methods to raise your security story. You by no means hear MIPS making any claims. We have executed, like I stated, 60,000 assessments. If you converse to any of the opposite manufacturers, in case you really discover that they’ve executed even one thousand assessments, I might be stunned. So after all, for us, it’s what it’s. As lengthy as they fight as laborious as they’ll to enhance helmet security, I’m a contented man. Long reply, however trustworthy.
MO: The firm has seen important development previously few years by way of the companions it really works with. What would you attribute that to?
MS: First, I feel we’re trusted by a variety of our companions. It’s very seldom that we lose a buyer. Sometimes, we even have to chop ties with clients that we don’t really feel can work inside our ingredient model world. During the session that we had at present, I really stated that and that made me so completely happy. The 4 manufacturers that had been right here at present, Troy Lee, Fox, Alpinestars, and Thor, they’re fierce opponents, however at present, it was about elevating security. Not one in all them spoke negatively about one another. They really complimented one another. Everyone talked about how we will convey the trade ahead, and that’s precisely the best way that it ought to work. When they exit in the marketplace, okay, let’s kill one another once more. That’s actually necessary, however when you’ll be able to depart status apart, I feel that’s an necessary factor. We can get manufacturers to do this, and I feel that helps loads. Today, when a model involves us, we at all times ask them, what’s your security story? Some of them say that, ‘I need MIPS because the market demands it.’ I don’t suppose that’s sufficient. You have to have your individual security story. You actually need to know what you’re bringing to the market. That is tremendous necessary for us to actually make it possible for everyone seems to be making a dedication to security when they’re integrating MIPS. Of course, you’ll nonetheless have higher and worse helmets, however so long as MIPS may also help to make each helmet a bit bit higher, I feel we’ve got executed an excellent job.
Then, all of us need to educate. I feel at present, in case you have a look at final yr, we nearly finalized one new helmet undertaking per working day. So, that’s greater than 200 helmets that may come out to the market throughout 2023. That is unbelievable. If you discuss to the manufacturers which can be opponents, in the event that they do two helmets in a yr, they’re most likely exhausted. It’s a very simple course of for us to work with a model. We care for the entire implementation. They don’t have to have assets on their aspect. They ship us a drawing. We have developed a really a lot plug-and-play sort of system as a result of we do it on a regular basis. We assign an engineer, and we need to make it doable and reasonably priced for everybody to make use of MIPS, and that has been one in all our success tales. As I discussed earlier than, I feel it additionally helps that we’re not judging anybody, not speaking dangerous about anybody. Like I stated, Popeye is a superb instance. You might be robust however you continue to must be inclusive. I converse loads to 6D and Bob Weaver. We meet at festivals and so forth. There isn’t any motive simply because he’s making a product that’s totally different from mine that we can’t discuss and study from one another. And I feel that’s the best way it must be.
There is rarely one a part of a hit story that’s actually the Holy Grail. I feel staying humble, and making an attempt to be collaborative is necessary. There isn’t any want for the method to be a lot totally different between a small model and an enormous model. We try to assist everybody develop pretty much as good of helmets as doable, I feel that’s off to an excellent begin. MIPS has began to grow to be a very well-known model. Awareness is rising in all places. We see that the shoppers are ready to pay for it, and we profit from that. As talked about, we’ve got been rising in moto quite a bit. Last yr was most likely round near 40% development, and this yr will seemingly be someplace round 50% in moto. So, the traction that we’ve gained right here has continued to develop for us.
MIPS has grow to be one of many loudest voices in rising expertise hoping to handle rotational impression power in helmets. When partnering with the most important manufacturers in whichever trade they may be concerned in, it helps to validate the expertise and will increase model consciousness exponentially. While MIPS has adjusted its model picture and advertising and marketing to raised resonate on the buyer degree, third-party testing is transferring at a slower price. Standardization in precise check procedures and between security requirements generally, amongst different issues, are nonetheless of their infancy. As this dialog continues and testing procedures grow to be extra developed and stringent, we – racers, riders, fanatics – profit with the rising tide.
Become a Motorcycle.com insider. Get the most recent motorbike information first by subscribing to our publication right here.
Source: www.motorbike.com