Consumers need safeguards on the forefront for automobiles with automated know-how resembling lane centering, automated lane altering and driver monitoring, new knowledge from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety exhibits.
“There does seem to be a genuine interest in this technology. But there’s also a bit of healthy skepticism around the general understanding that these systems are not meant to replace the driver, they’re not self-driving vehicles,” mentioned Alexandra Mueller, a analysis scientist at IIHS.
The survey discovered that individuals who desire hands-free lane-centering performance additionally appear to be essentially the most accepting of different driving applied sciences resembling driver monitoring. However, this nonetheless presents a problem, Mueller mentioned.
“The downside is that those people are more likely to indicate that they want to misuse these features, specifically, to use these technologies to do things that they’re not supposed to be doing behind the wheel, like texting,” Mueller mentioned. “This becomes a blurring of the line situation where people don’t necessarily understand where their roles and responsibilities lie when using these more sophisticated forms of driving support.”
In January, the IIHS created a brand new ranking program that evaluates the safeguards that automobiles with partial automation make the most of. Mueller mentioned these findings connect with the brand new ranking program.
“Those two findings go hand in hand with the safeguards. The biggest connections … have to do with the driver monitoring and the relationship between the acceptance of driver monitoring and feeling safer with its purpose, that’s directly in line with the safeguards program,” Mueller mentioned.
Though new know-how might make duties resembling lane altering extra handy, automakers should be sincere in relaying the ability of those new options, Mueller mentioned.
“These systems should be designed in ways that really communicate to the driver what their roles and responsibilities are, and to impose limits on the system functionality,” Mueller mentioned. “Functional testing has shown that these systems have very rigid operational boundaries. By making these systems designed in a way that keeps drivers part of the driving task, that is how you help to encourage designs that let people really know what their roles and responsibilities are when using the system.”
Source: www.autonews.com
