What do you get when you will have an organization create, develop and check a know-how nobody requested for with apparent technical points within the fifth largest metropolis within the nation? Annoyed residents and metropolis officers, plus a clueless CEO who doesn’t suppose the issues are an enormous deal. The Washington Post sat down with Cruise CEO Kyle Vogt concerning the current troubles his firm’s driverless vehicles have been having in San Francisco. He thinks all of the backlash is overblown.
Autonomous car testing has been happening in California for over a decade now. Yet lately it appears as if the autos, particularly ones from Cruise, have been having extra issues. Cruise has had 241 driverless automobile associated incidents since early 2022; 64 of these have been collisions. What does Cruise CEO Kyle Vogt need to say about all of this? Rather than immediately tackle the issues, he has fascinating takes. From an odd take that it’s sensationalism attributable to lack of knowledge:
…in an interview with The Washington Post, the CEO of the driverless automobile firm Cruise mentioned a lot of the angst ought to simply be chalked as much as anti-robot bias.
“Anything that we do differently than humans is being sensationalized,” Cruise CEO Kyle Vogt mentioned.
To seemingly getting mad at state regulators for his or her elevated scrutiny over the robotaxi incidents, a lot in order that he appears to say that it’s all overblown as a result of there haven’t been any accidents.
No one has ever been severely harm throughout a number of million miles of driving and lots of of hundreds of rides offered in San Francisco.
To downplaying a current site visitors incident involving dozens of robotaxis stalling in an intersection due to community congestion:
We’re speaking a few 15-minute site visitors delay for one thing that, however, is offering a large and fairly measurable public profit to the neighborhood.
He completed by saying there’s a double normal with regards to driverless vehicles in comparison with human drivers.
…he mentioned, it’s time for the general public to get rid of the “double standard” that it has for human drivers and driverless vehicles, saying that extra “mundane” points — like stopping quick in site visitors or veering into a motorcycle lane — wouldn’t catch any consideration if it was a human driver, however would trigger a firestorm if it was a driverless automobile.
“If I videotaped every single intersection, you see people blowing red lights rolling through stop signs and speeding,” he mentioned. “We’re surrounded by these hazards.”
Fortunately it appears to be like like San Francisco metropolis officers don’t agree in any respect. They’re at present asking state officers to rethink their current choice to permit driverless automobile corporations like Cruise and Waymo to broaden service within the metropolis. Like one Carnegie Mellon University professor who has studied autonomous vehicles mentioned, it’s solely a matter of time earlier than a extra critical accident occurs.
Source: jalopnik.com