It will need to have come as a shock when, this week in 1936, sellers acquired to see the brand new Cord 810, the primary Cord because the 1932 Cord L-29 ended manufacturing. In the interim, Cord Corp. bought the lower-priced Auburn, in-built Auburn, Indiana, and the stratospherically-expensive Duesenberg, in-built Indianapolis.
But now, the Cord had returned, and just like the L-29, the 810 was front-wheel drive. But the 810’s design was a knockout, the handiwork of Cord Corp. designer Gordon Buehrig, then a mere 32 years outdated.
But the beautiful new car had first began improvement again in 1933, and it wasn’t meant to be a Cord.
A design born at General Motors
It’s early in 1933, and Gordon Buehrig doubted Duesenberg Motors’ continued viability within the depths of the Great Depression. So Buehrig decamps to General Motors.
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.thedetroitbureau.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Gordon-Buehrig-GM-sketch-982x1024.jpg?resize=788%2C822&ssl=1)
Once there, GMs first design chief Harley Earle holds a contest amongst 5 design groups to design a four-door sedan to be proven on the Chicago Century of Progress exhibition. One of the groups was led by Buehrig, and concerned Buehrig’s concept of utilizing of two radiators that might block air to the engine, thus conserving the compartment clear. “It wasn’t a very good idea,” he wrote in his memoir, “Rolling Sculpture.” “But it set up a package problem that was bound to give a new look to the front end.”
While his crew was pleased with the consequence, Buehrig’s design positioned final.
Then in September 1933, Buehrig receives a name from Cord Corporation president Harold Ames to debate the concept of a smaller, lower-price Duesenberg to complement the corporate’s pricey, custom-bodied Model J. The concept was hardly a brand new one; Cadillac had launched its lower-priced LaSalle in 1927, underpinned by an Oldsmobile chassis. Ames was searching for one thing comparable, using the equipment used to fabricate Auburns. The assembly with Ames leads Buehrig’s resignation from GM, taking his failed design with him.
Once extra at Duesenberg, Buehrig revives his GM two-radiator sedan. Ames didn’t assume patrons would care a few clear engine compartment, however he was intrigued by the notion of a automobile with out a conventional front-mounted radiator.
“I made two pencil sketches for him and he approved the idea,” Buehrig recollects. “The body was built by Weymann in Indianapolis and Derham followed the details of its construction. While this was going on, Auggie Duesenberg was reworking an Auburn chassis and the problems of the twin radiator arrangement.”
Buehrig mentioned the ensuing automobile ought to have gone into manufacturing in February 1934. But a company disaster would delay its launch.
A company disaster brings success
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.thedetroitbureau.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/1935-Auburn-Eight-Supercharged-Speedster1336018_-1024x670.jpg?resize=788%2C516&ssl=1)
When Harold Ames arrived in 1933 to function president of Cord Corporation, he found a 1934 Auburn that had been redesigned to the chagrin of Auburn’s sellers. Ames wasn’t any happier, and he assigns Buehrig and Auggie Duesenberg the duty of a crash redesign of the automobile.
“With a $50,000 budget, we couldn’t do much,” Buehrig recollects.
He modifications the fenders’ design, enlarges the radiator shell and grille, and offers the hood a contemporary look. Meanwhile, Duesenberg works with the Lycoming Engine Division, creating a supercharged straight 8.
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.thedetroitbureau.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/1936-Cord-810-Westchester722566_-1024x830.jpg?resize=788%2C639&ssl=1)
Dubbed the Model 850, gross sales decide up. But its June introduction proves problematic.
“It didn’t give us a new ‘bomb’ for show time when the other automobile companies were making their normal 1935 model line announcements. Ames wanted a sensational model to gain the free coverage of the media which you can only get at auto show time if you have something worthy of their attention.”
Having design boattail speedsters for Duesenberg, Buehrig decides to do the identical for Auburn. Ready for the 1935 auto present season, the mannequin introduced the eye Ames had needed. “It stole the show and much of the newsprint,” Buehrig mentioned.
A stillborn challenge revived
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.thedetroitbureau.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Gordon-Buehrig-patent-drawing-2-1024x771.jpg?resize=788%2C593&ssl=1)
With Auburn’s fortunes steadied, consideration turns as soon as once more to the newborn Duesenberg.
“A decision was made, presumably in Cord Corp.’s Chicago headquarters, to revive the small Duesenberg program but do it in Auburn, to redesign it for a V-8 and front-wheel-drive configuration and call it a Cord.”
If the Cord’s exterior design was extraordinary, so was the inside’s improvements. Buehrig designed the instrument panel to deal with completely different dimension gauges in order that drivers may inform them aside at a look. Among them, was a tachometer, uncommon for the time. The Cord was additionally the primary automobile that allowed the driving force to regulate the extent of instrument panel lighting.
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.thedetroitbureau.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/1936-Cord-810-Westchester722567_-1024x790.jpg?resize=788%2C608&ssl=1)
Its 4.7-liter V-8 engine powered the entrance wheels via a Bendix Electric Hand 4-speed guide gearbox. The driver shifted from first into second gear by shifting a thumb lever mounted in an h-gate on the finish of a column-mounted stalk. The vacuum-powered clutch servo engaged as soon as the driving force both depressed and launched the clutch pedal or lifted their foot off the throttle and reapplied it.
But maybe the Cord’s greatest innovation are its pop-up headlights. Originally designed to be electrically operated, improvement prices proved too excessive. So, they’re manually cranked open and closed. Then there was its radio antenna; it’s positioned below the automobile so it wouldn’t muddle the automobile’s design.
The Cord 810 can be revealed to sellers this week in 1935, adopted by its public exhibiting on the New York Auto Show on November 2nd.
“To say the Cord stole the show would be an understatement,” Buehrig mentioned. “Optimism was high.”
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.thedetroitbureau.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/1936-Cord-810-Westchester722569_-1024x683.jpg?resize=788%2C526&ssl=1)
But the automobile’s launch didn’t go properly. The firm tried to construct 1,000 models month-to-month, a scale the automaker by no means earlier than tried.
“Production of the Cord got underway lowly and the first cars were plagued with trouble. The cars overheated in warm summer weather and the transmissions didn’t work well. … It is surprising the car lasted two years.”
But by the point the issues have been resolved, Cord Corp. was completed.
Surprisingly, the Cord 810 was not.
One extra probability
![](https://i0.wp.com/www.thedetroitbureau.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Graham-Cord-1024x589.jpg?resize=788%2C453&ssl=1)
Hupp Motor Car Co. of Detroit was seeing its personal fortunes decline in 1937, and noticed the Cord 810’s recognition as a lifeline. So they purchased its tooling and dies to be used as a brand new mannequin, the Hupp Skylark.
But Hupp made modifications, tapering its traditional coffin-nose hood and including a three-piece radiator. Fixed headlights changed the pop-up models. And Hupp’s personal rear-wheel-drive powertrain powered by an inline six supplanted the Cord’s V-8 and front-wheel drive.
Even worse, one other bastardized model of the automobile was supplied by Graham-Paige Motors, which had additionally fallen on exhausting occasions. Their model, the Graham Hollywood, fared little higher than the Hupp Skylark. By 1940, each fashions have been gone.
Source: www.thedetroitbureau.com